Images of Organization PDF: How Gareth Morgan's Metaphors Can Help You Understand and Manage Your Organization Better
Images of Organization by Gareth Morgan: A Comprehensive Guide
Have you ever wondered how to understand, analyze, and improve your organization? Do you want to learn how to use different perspectives and lenses to see your organization in a new light? If so, then you might be interested in reading Images of Organization by Gareth Morgan.
images of organization gareth morgan pdf download
Images of Organization is a classic book in the field of organizational theory and management. It was first published in 1986 and has been updated several times since then. In this book, Morgan presents eight metaphors that can help us view organizations in different ways. Each metaphor reveals some aspects of organizational reality, but also hides others. By using multiple metaphors, we can gain a richer and more holistic understanding of our organizations.
In this article, we will provide a comprehensive guide to Images of Organization by Gareth Morgan. We will explain what Images of Organization is, why it is important, and how to use it. We will also describe the eight metaphors of organization that Morgan proposes, and discuss their benefits and limitations. Finally, we will show you how to download Images of Organization by Gareth Morgan PDF for free or at a low cost.
What is Images of Organization?
Images of Organization is a book that explores the power of metaphors in shaping our perception and understanding of organizations. Metaphors are figures of speech that compare two things that are not literally alike, but share some common characteristics. For example, when we say that an organization is like a machine, we are using a metaphor.
Metaphors are not just linguistic devices, but also cognitive tools that help us make sense of complex and ambiguous phenomena. Metaphors allow us to simplify reality by highlighting some features and ignoring others. Metaphors also enable us to create new meanings and insights by connecting seemingly unrelated domains.
Morgan argues that metaphors are essential for understanding organizations, because organizations are social constructions that depend on our interpretation and interaction. Organizations do not have an objective or fixed essence, but rather multiple and dynamic identities that emerge from the interplay of various actors and factors. Therefore, there is no single or best way to describe or explain organizations, but rather multiple and complementary ways that depend on our perspective and purpose.
Why is Images of Organization important?
Images of Organization is important because it challenges us to think critically and creatively about organizations. It helps us to recognize that our conventional ways of seeing organizations are not natural or inevitable, but rather influenced by our assumptions, values, and interests. It also helps us to appreciate that other people may have different views and experiences of organizations, depending on their background, role, and situation.
By exposing us to different metaphors of organization, Images of Organization invites us to question our taken-for-granted beliefs and practices, and to explore new possibilities and alternatives. It also encourages us to adopt a multi-faceted and flexible approach to organizational analysis and intervention, by using different metaphors to suit different contexts and objectives. It also stimulates us to generate our own metaphors and frameworks, by drawing on our imagination and intuition.
How to use Images of Organization?
Images of Organization can be used in various ways, depending on your goals and needs. Here are some suggestions on how to use Images of Organization:
If you want to learn more about organizational theory and management, you can read Images of Organization as a textbook or a reference book. You can also use it as a source of inspiration and ideas for your own research or projects.
If you want to understand your own organization better, you can use Images of Organization as a diagnostic tool or a lens. You can apply different metaphors to your organization and see what they reveal or conceal about its structure, culture, processes, problems, and potentials. You can also compare and contrast different metaphors and see how they relate or conflict with each other.
If you want to improve your organization or solve a specific issue, you can use Images of Organization as a guide or a catalyst. You can use different metaphors to generate new insights and solutions, or to challenge existing ones. You can also use different metaphors to communicate and collaborate with others, or to persuade and influence them.
Of course, these are not the only ways to use Images of Organization. You can also combine or adapt them according to your preferences and circumstances. The key is to be open-minded and curious, and to experiment with different metaphors and perspectives.
The Eight Metaphors of Organization
In Images of Organization, Morgan proposes eight metaphors that can help us view organizations in different ways. These metaphors are:
Organization as Machine
Organization as Organism
Organization as Brain
Organization as Culture
Organization as Political System
Organization as Psychic Prison
Organization as Flux and Transformation
Organization as Instrument of Domination
Each metaphor has its own assumptions, implications, strengths, and weaknesses. Each metaphor also reflects a certain historical and intellectual context, and resonates with certain types of organizations. Let's take a closer look at each metaphor and see what it can teach us about organizations.
Organization as Machine
The machine metaphor is one of the oldest and most dominant metaphors of organization. It views organizations as rational, efficient, and predictable systems that operate according to predefined rules and procedures. It emphasizes the importance of designing, controlling, and optimizing the structure, functions, and outputs of organizations.
The machine metaphor is influenced by the classical management theories of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, such as scientific management, administrative management, and bureaucracy. It is also influenced by the mechanistic worldview of Newtonian physics, which sees the universe as a giant clockwork that follows deterministic laws.
The machine metaphor is suitable for organizations that operate in stable, simple, and certain environments, where the goals are clear and the tasks are routine. It is also suitable for organizations that value efficiency, reliability, consistency, and quality over innovation, flexibility, diversity, and learning.
Benefits of the Machine Metaphor
The machine metaphor has several benefits for understanding and managing organizations:
It provides a clear and logical framework for organizing work and resources.
It facilitates coordination and communication among different parts of the organization.
It enhances productivity and performance by minimizing waste and errors.
It ensures accountability and responsibility by defining roles and authority.
It fosters stability and order by establishing rules and standards.
Limitations of the Machine Metaphor
The machine metaphor also has several limitations for understanding and managing organizations:
It ignores or suppresses the human aspects of organizations, such as emotions, values, creativity, motivation, etc.
It discourages or prevents adaptation and innovation by imposing rigid structures and processes.
It creates or exacerbates conflicts and power struggles by enforcing hierarchy and bureaucracy.
It reduces or eliminates diversity and variety by imposing uniformity and conformity.
It fails or breaks down when faced with complex, dynamic, or uncertain environments that require flexibility and responsiveness.
Organization as Organism
Organization as Organism
The organism metaphor is another common metaphor of organization. It views organizations as living, adaptive, and interdependent systems that interact with their environment. It emphasizes the importance of aligning, balancing, and developing the needs, capabilities, and resources of organizations.
The organism metaphor is influenced by the systems theory and the contingency theory of the mid-20th century, which see organizations as open systems that respond to environmental changes and demands. It is also influenced by the biological sciences, which study the structure, function, and evolution of living organisms.
The organism metaphor is suitable for organizations that operate in complex, dynamic, and uncertain environments, where the goals are ambiguous and the tasks are non-routine. It is also suitable for organizations that value adaptation, innovation, diversity, and learning over efficiency, reliability, consistency, and quality.
Benefits of the Organism Metaphor
The organism metaphor has several benefits for understanding and managing organizations:
It recognizes and respects the human aspects of organizations, such as emotions, values, creativity, motivation, etc.
It encourages and supports adaptation and innovation by allowing flexible structures and processes.
It resolves or reduces conflicts and power struggles by fostering collaboration and participation.
It enhances or creates diversity and variety by embracing differences and changes.
It survives or thrives when faced with complex, dynamic, or uncertain environments that require flexibility and responsiveness.
Limitations of the Organism Metaphor
The organism metaphor also has several limitations for understanding and managing organizations:
It provides a vague and complex framework for organizing work and resources.
It complicates coordination and communication among different parts of the organization.
It lowers productivity and performance by allowing waste and errors.
It undermines accountability and responsibility by blurring roles and authority.
It creates instability and disorder by changing rules and standards.
Organization as Brain
The brain metaphor is a more recent and innovative metaphor of organization. It views organizations as intelligent, learning, and self-organizing systems that process information and generate knowledge. It emphasizes the importance of creating, storing, sharing, and applying the information and knowledge of organizations.
The brain metaphor is influenced by the cybernetics theory and the learning organization theory of the late 20th century, which see organizations as feedback loops that learn from their experience and environment. It is also influenced by the cognitive sciences, which study the structure, function, and development of human cognition.
The brain metaphor is suitable for organizations that operate in complex, dynamic, and uncertain environments, where the goals are ambiguous and the tasks are non-routine. It is also suitable for organizations that value adaptation, innovation, diversity, and learning over efficiency, reliability, consistency, and quality.
Benefits of the Brain Metaphor
The brain metaphor has several benefits for understanding and managing organizations:
It recognizes and respects the human aspects of organizations, such as emotions, values, creativity, motivation etc.
It encourages and supports adaptation and innovation by allowing flexible structures and processes.
It resolves or reduces conflicts and power struggles by fostering collaboration and participation.
It enhances or creates diversity and variety by embracing differences and changes.
It survives or thrives when faced with complex, dynamic or uncertain environments that require flexibility and responsiveness.
Limitations of the Brain Metaphor
The brain metaphor also has several limitations for understanding and managing organizations:
It provides a vague and complex framework for organizing work and resources.
It complicates coordination and communication among different parts of the organization.
It lowers productivity and performance by allowing waste and errors.
It undermines accountability and responsibility by blurring roles and authority.
It creates instability and disorder by changing rules and standards.
Organization as Culture
The culture metaphor is another recent and innovative metaphor of organization. It views organizations as shared, symbolic, and social systems that express values, beliefs, and meanings. It emphasizes the importance of understanding, shaping, and changing the culture of organizations.
The culture metaphor is influenced by the interpretive and the postmodern perspectives of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, which see organizations as subjective and multiple realities that are constructed and negotiated by various actors and factors. It is also influenced by the anthropology and the sociology, which study the norms, practices, and rituals of human groups and societies.
The culture metaphor is suitable for organizations that operate in complex, dynamic, and uncertain environments, where the goals are ambiguous and the tasks are non-routine. It is also suitable for organizations that value adaptation, innovation, diversity, and learning over efficiency, reliability, consistency, and quality.
Benefits of the Culture Metaphor
The culture metaphor has several benefits for understanding and managing organizations:
It recognizes and respects the human aspects of organizations, such as emotions, values, creativity, motivation etc.
It encourages and supports adaptation and innovation by allowing flexible structures and processes.
It resolves or reduces conflicts and power struggles by fostering collaboration and participation.
It enhances or creates diversity and variety by embracing differences and changes.
It survives or thrives when faced with complex, dynamic or uncertain environments that require flexibility and responsiveness.
Limitations of the Culture Metaphor
The culture metaphor also has several limitations for understanding and managing organizations:
It provides a vague and complex framework for organizing work and resources.
It complicates coordination and communication among different parts of the organization.
It lowers productivity and performance by allowing waste and errors.
It undermines accountability and responsibility by blurring roles and authority.
It creates instability and disorder by changing rules and standards.
Organization as Political System
The political system metaphor is a more critical and realistic metaphor of organization. It views organizations as arenas, processes, and games of power, influence, and conflict. It emphasizes the importance of identifying, analyzing, and managing the interests, agendas, and strategies of various stakeholders of organizations.
The political system metaphor is influenced by the political science and the critical theory of the mid-20th century, which see organizations as sites of domination and resistance that reflect and reproduce social inequalities and injustices. It is also influenced by the psychology and the sociology, which study the motives, behaviors, and relationships of human individuals and groups.
The political system metaphor is suitable for organizations that operate in complex, dynamic, and uncertain environments, where the goals are ambiguous and the tasks are non-routine. It is also suitable for organizations that value adaptation, innovation, diversity, and learning over efficiency, reliability, consistency, and quality.
Benefits of the Political System Metaphor
The political system metaphor has several benefits for understanding and managing organizations:
It recognizes and respects the human aspects of organizations, such as emotions, values, creativity, motivation etc.
It encourages and supports adaptation and innovation by allowing flexible structures and processes.
It resolves or reduces conflicts and power struggles by fostering collaboration and participation.
It enhances or creates diversity and variety by embracing differences and changes.
It survives or thrives when faced with complex, dynamic or uncertain environments that require flexibility and responsiveness.
Limitations of the Political System Metaphor
The political system metaphor also has several limitations for understanding and managing organizations:
It provides a vague and complex framework for organizing work and resources.
It complicates coordination and communication among different parts of the organization.
It lowers productivity and performance by allowing waste and errors.
It undermines accountability and responsibility by blurring roles and authority.
It creates instability and disorder by changing rules and standards.
Organization as Psychic Prison
The psychic prison metaphor is a more radical and provocative metaphor of organization. It views organizations as traps, illusions, and distortions that limit our thinking, feeling, and acting. It emphasizes the importance of uncovering, challenging, and transforming the unconscious assumptions, biases, and fears that shape our organizational reality.
Organization as Psychic Prison
The psychic prison metaphor is a more radical and provocative metaphor of organization. It views organizations as traps, illusions, and distortions that limit our thinking, feeling, and acting. It emphasizes the importance of uncovering, challenging, and transforming the unconscious assumptions, biases, and fears that shape our organizational reality.
The psychic prison metaphor is influenced by the psychoanalysis and the existentialism of the early 20th century, which see organizations as manifestations of our inner conflicts, anxieties, and desires. It is also influenced by the philosophy and the literature, which explore the themes of freedom, meaning, and absurdity in human existence.
The psychic prison metaphor is suitable for organizations that operate in complex, dynamic, and uncertain environments, where the goals are ambiguous and the tasks are non-routine. It is also suitable for organizations that value adaptation, innovation, diversity, and learning over efficiency, reliability, consistency, and quality.
Benefits of the Psychic Prison Metaphor
The psychic prison metaphor has several benefits for understanding and managing organizations:
It recognizes and respects the human aspects of organizations, such as emotions, values, creativity, motivation etc.
It encourages and supports adaptation and innovation by allowing flexible structures and processes.
It resolves or reduces conflicts and power struggles by fostering collaboration and participation.
It enhances or creates diversity and variety by embracing differences and changes.
It survives or thrives when faced with complex, dynamic or uncertain environments that require flexibility and responsiveness.
L